Handicrafts of Great Khorasan

Handicrafts of Great Khorasan

Juxtaposition of Contrasting Motifs in the Decorative Frames of the Dome of Allahverdi Khan: An Analysis Based on Derrida’s Deconstruction of Binary Oppositions

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Comparative and Analytical History of Islamic Art, University of Art, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Comparative and Analytical History of Islamic Art, University of Art, Tehran, Iran
3 PhD Candidate in Comparative and Analytical History of Islamic Art, University of Art, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/hgj.2026.529219.1044
Abstract
The Allah Verdi Khan Dome, a Safavid‑era structure within the shrine of Imam Reza (A.S.), is renowned for its intricate mosaic tilework, in which contrasts of color and form are prominently employed. Jacques Derrida (1930–2004), within his deconstructive framework, critiques binary oppositions in structuralist thought and emphasizes the inherent ambiguity of textual meaning, rejecting the notion of a single fixed interpretation. This study examines the potential meanings and chains of signification conveyed by the contrasting motifs of the dome through a Derridean lens, with the aim of broadening the interpretive scope of traditional ornamentation. The research adopts a descriptive–analytical approach and relies on library and archival sources, using books, digital resources, and photographic documentation as primary tools. Findings indicate multiple types of contrast in both form and color across the dome’s decorative tile panels; from a Derridean perspective, these motifs do not signify a single, stable concept but rather a chain of interrelated concepts and symbols. Such a reading expands the range of meanings and interpretations associated with traditional decorative motifs and elements.
Keywords
Subjects

·         Ahi, M., & Taheri, M. (2019). Critique and analysis of Derrida’s deconstruction theory in understanding texts. Philosophical and Theological Research Quarterly, (93).
·         Ahmadi, B. (1991). Structure and interpretation of texts [In Persian]. Tehran: Nashr-e Markaz.
·         Ahmadi, B. (1992). From visual signs to text: Toward a semiotics of visual communication [In Persian]. Tehran: Nashr-e Markaz.
·         Ardalan, N., & Bakhtiar, L. (2011). The sense of unity: The role of tradition in Iranian architecture (V. Jalili, Trans.) [In Persian]. Tehran: Elm-e Memar.
·         Dondis, D. A. (2004). A primer of visual literacy (M. Sepehr, Trans.) [In Persian]. Tehran: Soroush.
·         Ghasemabadi, G. R., Rajabi, M. A., Khazaei, M., Rikhtegaran, M. R., & Pourrezaian, M. (2014). A study on the semantic foundations of framing in pre‑Islamic Iranian art. Naghereh Journal, (30).
·         Hosseini Rad, A. (2005). Fundamentals of visual arts [In Persian]. Tehran: Iran Textbook Publishing Company.
·         Khan Hosseinabadi, A. (2020). The role of the peacock in the tilework of the Holy Shrine of Imam Reza, with emphasis on Allahverdi Khan Dome (Safavid era). Naghereh Journal, (59).
·         Khan Hosseinabadi, A., & Eshraghi, M. (2018). Symbolic concepts of animal motifs in the tilework of Allahverdi Khan Dome, Safavid era, Imam Reza Shrine. Islamic Art Studies, (31).
·         Mohseni Gardkouhi, F. (2017). Binary oppositions in Attar’s ghazals. Specialized Quarterly of Persian Poetry and Prose Stylistics (Bahar-e Adab), (36), 249–268.
·         Munari, B. (2008). Design and visual communication (P. Shahandeh, Trans.) [In Persian]. Tehran: Soroush.
·         Norris, C. (2001). Deconstruction (P. Yazdanjou, Trans.) [In Persian]. Tehran: Shirazeh.
·         Ocvirk, O. G., Stinson, R. E., Wigg, P. R., Bone, R. O., & Cayton, D. L. (2011). Art fundamentals: Theory and practice [In Persian]. Tehran: SAMT.
·         Parizadian Kavan, M. (2015). An investigation of the relationship between the frame (border) and narrative in Persian miniature painting from the Ilkhanid to the end of the Timurid era (Master’s thesis) [In Persian]. Tarbiat Modares University, Faculty of Art and Architecture.
·         Pishkhani, M. (2013). Deconstruction in the thought of Jacques Derrida. Retrieved from https://www.kiankiani.com
·         Pishkhvani, M., & Kiani, K. (2013). Deconstruction in Jacques Derrida’s thought. [Details not available].
·         Pourmohammad, S., & Mousavi Lor, A. al‑S. (2021). Interaction of meaning and visual motifs: A case study of Maurits Escher’s “Day and Night”. Islamic Art Studies Journal, (44).
·         Rajabi, Z., & Ahmadpanah, S. A. (2020). The role of framing in Iranian miniature paintings: An innovative look at the works of Mahmoud Farshchian. Naghereh Journal, (55).
·         Ranjbaran, D., Arman, E., & Salehi, A. (2023). Rethinking form and meaning in the representational motifs of living creatures in the tiles of Imam Reza Shrine (Safavid era), with emphasis on the Dome of Allahverdi Khan. Biannual Journal of Decorative Arts, (2).
·         Sa’adati, R., Hessamifar, M., Mousavi Lor, A. al‑S., & Afhami, R. (2021). Analysis of binary oppositions in the structure of Shahsavan tribal Verni rugs of Moghan Plain (case study: underlays). Journal of Theoretical Foundations of Visual Arts, (12).
·         Shayestehfar, M. (2002). Content analysis of religious inscriptions of the Timurid and Safavid periods. Alzahra Humanities Journal, 12(43).
·         Schuon, F. (2002). The essence and shell of Islamic mysticism (M. Hojjat, Trans.) [In Persian]. Tehran: Sohravardi Research and Publishing Office.
·         Shokrpur, S., & Azhari, F. (2021). The polysemic nature of visual signs in Iranian miniature art: A case study of four illustrations from the Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasp in the Aga Khan Museum. Journal of Literary Criticism and Rhetoric, 10(3).
·         Vaezi, A. (2009). The reflection of ontology of meaning in religious knowledge. Quarterly Journal of A’in‑e Hikmat (The Doctrine of Wisdom), (2).

  • Receive Date 26 May 2025
  • Revise Date 01 July 2025
  • Accept Date 11 August 2025